(submitted in response to
Chris Sheridan's January 23, 2000 Plain Dealer commentary The test just
isn't the problem)
January
23, 2000
Dear
Editor,
Chris
Sheridan, in her January 23 editorial The test just isn’t the problem, asks
when faced with the state report cards and proficiency test scores, “Why are
urban teachers so darned defensive, so sure they see slights at every turn?” To answer that question, one only has to
look at her article’s opening sentence: “Cleveland teachers are still smarting
from the low marks the district received…”
Not Cleveland students, not Cleveland parents, not Mayor
White, not Superintendent Byrd-Bennett, not The Cleveland School
Board, not Cleveland School District Administrators and Principals,
and not Cleveland residents and taxpayers, but Cleveland teachers
are the first words. She implies that
Cleveland teachers bear the sole responsibility for the district’s poor
showing.
While
there is no doubt that teachers have a great deal to do with how well students
fare on the state proficiency test, her commentary omitted some obvious but
critical facts:
·
Students take the tests, not teachers.
·
Parental participation in education has the greatest influence on student
achievement.
·
Teachers
must teach according to a school’s curriculum or Graded Courses of
Study.
·
Local school boards (not the state or individual classroom teachers) ultimately control
what is and is not in a school’s curriculum.
Teachers have no control of what goes on outside of the classroom. They cannot take the tests for the students, prevent them from being absent or dropping out (two of the 27 state indicators), make them do homework or review, or purchase the textbooks or materials that are best aligned with local, state, or national standards.
The
state proficiency tests should be primarily assessments of student
achievement. They may also serve a
secondary purpose of assessing teachers as well as parents, principals,
administrators, board members, superintendents, and in our city’s case, the
mayor. Districts that score well on the
report cards applaud and take pride in the efforts made by the whole community. Poor showings in all 27 areas must be blamed
on everyone, not just one group. But
Sheridan’s comments make it clear that she believes that if the problem is not
the test, it has to be the teachers and the teachers alone. Are we, as a community, really that stupid?
Milton
Alan Turner